How to A/B Test Below The Fold?

A/B testing below the fold content presents a unique challenge for marketers and UX designers.

The problem? Users may not always scroll down to see the changes you're testing, potentially skewing your results and leading to inaccurate conclusions.

This issue can significantly impact your optimization efforts, especially when trying to improve elements that aren't immediately visible when a page loads.

Let's dive into this tricky situation and explore effective strategies to conduct meaningful A/B tests for content that's not visible at first glance.

The Problem

Before we jump into solutions, it's crucial to grasp why testing below-the-fold content is problematic. Here's the deal:

1. Visibility Issues: Not all users scroll down to see the content you're testing.
2. Inconsistent Exposure: Different users may see the test variations at different times, if at all.
3. Sample Ratio Mismatch (SRM): This occurs when the distribution of users in your test groups doesn't match your intended split.
4. Flicker Effect: Some solutions might cause a visible "flicker" as the test loads, negatively impacting user experience.

These factors can lead to unreliable data and, consequently, misguided decisions. So, how do we tackle this?

Strategies for A/B Testing Below the Fold

1. Scroll-Triggered Experiments

One approach is to trigger the experiment when users reach a certain scroll depth. Here's how it works:

1. Set up your A/B test as usual.
2. Implement a scroll depth trigger (e.g., when the user scrolls 50% down the page).
3. Only activate the test variation when the trigger fires.

Pros:

• Ensures users actually see the tested element.
• Can provide more accurate data on user interaction with the tested element.

Cons:

• May cause a flicker effect as the variation loads mid-scroll.
• Reduces the sample size, as not all visitors will trigger the test.

2. Page-Level Targeting with Event Segmentation

This method involves:

1. Setting up the test at the page level (loading for all users).
2. Implementing an event that fires when users reach the tested element.
3. Segmenting results based on this event.

Pros:

• No flicker effect.
• Larger initial sample size.

Cons:

• Potential for Sample Ratio Mismatch (SRM).
• More complex analysis required.

3. Hybrid Approach: Universal Loading with Scroll-Based Reporting

This strategy combines elements of the previous two:

1. Load the test for 100% of users at the page level.
2. Implement a scroll depth trigger.
3. Only count a "sighting" or "exposure" when users reach the trigger point.

Pros:

• Eliminates flicker.
• Provides more accurate exposure data.

Cons:

• Requires more sophisticated tracking and analysis.
• May still face some SRM issues.

4. Heatmap and Scroll Map Analysis

Before running an A/B test, consider using heatmaps and scroll maps to understand user behavior:

1. Implement heatmap and scroll map tools on your page.
2. Analyze where users are clicking and how far they're scrolling.
3. Use this data to inform your test design and placement.

Pros:

• Provides valuable insights into user behavior.
• Can help optimize test placement and design.

Cons:

• Doesn't directly solve the A/B testing challenge.
• Requires additional tools and analysis.

Best Practices for Below-the-Fold A/B Testing

Regardless of the method you choose, here are some best practices to keep in mind:

1. Clear Hypothesis: Develop a clear, testable hypothesis for your below-the-fold content.
2. Consistent Trigger Points: If using scroll-based triggers, use specific pixel depths rather than percentages to ensure consistency across devices.
3. Adequate Sample Size: Ensure your test runs long enough to gather a statistically significant sample, especially if using scroll-triggered methods.
4. Monitor for SRM: Regularly check for Sample Ratio Mismatch, particularly when using page-level targeting.
5. Consider User Experience: Always prioritize user experience. Avoid methods that could cause noticeable page load issues or flicker effects.
6. Segment Analysis: Analyze your results based on scroll depth and time spent on page to gain deeper insights.
7. Multi-Step Analysis: Consider breaking your analysis into steps:
   • Step 1: Did users see the variation?
   • Step 2: Of those who saw it, what was the impact?
8. Tool Selection: Choose an A/B testing tool that allows for flexible triggering and event-based segmentation.

Case Study: E-commerce Product Recommendations

Let's look at a real-world example. An e-commerce company wanted to test different layouts for their "Recommended Products" section, which appeared below the fold on product pages.

The Challenge: Initial A/B tests showed no significant difference between variations. However, they suspected this was because many users weren't scrolling down to see the recommendations.

The Solution: They implemented a hybrid approach:

1. The test loaded for all users at the page level.
2. They added a scroll depth trigger at the exact pixel height where the recommendation section began.
3. Only users who scrolled to this point were counted in the test results.
4. They also tracked an "interaction" event for users who clicked on a recommended product.

The Results:

• They discovered that only 40% of users were actually seeing the recommendation section.
• Among those who did see it, Variation B increased click-through rates by 25%.
• This led to a site-wide change and a 10% increase in cross-sell revenue.

This case study highlights the importance of accurately measuring exposure in below-the-fold testing.

Tools for Below-the-Fold A/B Testing

Several A/B testing tools offer features that can help with below-the-fold testing:

1. Mida.so: Offers scroll depth triggers and custom JavaScript events.
2. Optimizely: Provides robust event tracking and segmentation capabilities.
3. VWO (Visual Website Optimizer): Includes heatmaps and scrollmaps alongside A/B testing features.
4. AB Tasty: Offers advanced triggering options and user behavior analysis.

When selecting a tool, look for features like:

• Flexible experiment triggering
• Event-based segmentation
• Integration with analytics platforms
• Heatmap and scrollmap capabilities

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

As you venture into below-the-fold A/B testing, be aware of these common mistakes:

1. Ignoring Scroll Depth: Failing to consider how many users actually see your test variations.
2. Overcomplicating Tests: Trying to test too many elements at once, making it difficult to isolate the impact of below-the-fold changes.
3. Neglecting Mobile Users: Remember that "below the fold" can mean very different things on desktop vs. mobile devices.
4. Rushing to Conclusions: Not running tests long enough to gather sufficient data, especially given the reduced exposure of below-the-fold content.
5. Disregarding Load Time: Some testing methods can impact page load time, which itself can affect user behavior and skew results.

The Future of Below-the-Fold Testing

As web technologies and user behaviors evolve, so too will our approaches to below-the-fold testing. Here are some trends to watch:

1. AI-Powered Analysis: Machine learning algorithms may help predict user scroll behavior and optimize test delivery.
2. Personalized Scroll Experiences: Websites might adapt their layout based on individual user scroll patterns.
3. Advanced Viewport Tracking: More sophisticated tools for understanding exactly what's in a user's viewport at any given time.
4. Integrated UX Testing: Combining A/B testing with other UX research methods for a more holistic approach.

Conclusion

A/B testing below-the-fold content doesn't have to be a headache. By understanding the challenges, choosing the right strategy, and following best practices, you can gain valuable insights into how users interact with all parts of your page – not just what's immediately visible.

Remember, the key is to ensure that your test accurately measures both exposure and impact. Whether you opt for scroll-triggered experiments, page-level targeting with event segmentation, or a hybrid approach, always keep the user experience at the forefront of your testing strategy.

Happy testing!

FAQs

Q: How long should I run a below-the-fold A/B test?
‍A: Generally longer than above-the-fold tests. Aim for at least 2-4 weeks, or until you reach statistical significance with a large enough sample of users who've been exposed to the test.

Q: Can I use the same A/B testing approach for mobile and desktop?
‍A: While the principles are similar, you may need to adjust trigger points and consider different user behaviors on mobile vs. desktop. It's often best to segment your results by device type.

Q: How do I know if I'm experiencing a Sample Ratio Mismatch (SRM)?
‍A: Compare the traffic split in your test to your intended split. If there's a significant discrepancy (usually more than 5%), you may have an SRM issue.

Q: Is it worth A/B testing elements that are far below the fold?
‍A: It can be, especially for long-form content or product pages. However, consider using scroll depth analysis first to understand how many users typically reach that point.

Q: How can I minimize the risk of a flicker effect when testing below-the-fold content?
‍A: Use asynchronous loading for your test variations and consider techniques like preloading or skeleton screens to smooth the transition.

‍